Adams
Adams v. Community Housing Partnership
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMY ADAMS, Case No. 23-cv-06073-WHO
Plaintiff,
ORDER RESOLVING DEPOSITION
v. DISPUTE
COMMUNITY HOUSING Re: Dkt. No.
PARTNERSHIP,
11 Defendant.
13 The parties are once again at odds. This time, the dispute centers around plaintiff Amy 14 Adams’s deposition and production of documents. It goes without saying that these are the types 15 of issues that counsel should be able to resolve between themselves without court supervision. 16 A. Deposition 17 Adams was one hour late to her scheduled November 20, 2024, deposition in Berkeley, 18 California, because her car was broken into. The deposition started at around 11:00 A.M. instead 19 of 10:00 A.M., and Adams sat for approximately 3.5 hours of time on the record. At the 20 deposition, defendant Community Housing Partnership (d/b/a and hereafter, “HomeRise”) noted 21 that Adams’ deposition would need to be continued to another day to be completed, but Adams 22 objected. HomeRise now asks that I order Adams…