Davidson

Davidson v. Palantir Technologies, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20243:24-cv-01357California3,810 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFERY DAVIDSON, Case No.: 24-cv-1357-RSH-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL

ARBITRATION

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC., a

Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-25, [ECF No. 5] inclusive,

16 Defendants.

17 18 Pending before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration filed by defendant Palantir Technologies Inc. ECF No. 5. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the reasons below, the Court grants Defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History On June 28, 2024, plaintiff Jeffrey Davidson filed this lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court against Defendant, his former employer. Defendant sells software for the integration, visualization, and analysis of data. ECF No. 1-2 ¶ 10. Plaintiff worked as a salesperson for Defendant from June 2021 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.