Simon
Simon v. Bostic
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILLIP W. SIMON, Case No.: 24-CV-01665-CAB-MSB
Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT
v. [ECF Nos. 1, 19, 24–26, 28.] TANISHA BOSTIC et al., Defendants. 16 On September 18, 2024, Plaintiff Phillip W. Simon filed a complaint against Defendants Tanisha Bostic, Lynetta Watts, Nora Watts, Sharon L. “Kalemkarian,” and Does 1–10. [ECF No. 1.] Plaintiff has moved for default judgment against three of the named Defendants. [ECF No. 19, 24–26.] Those Defendants have asked this Court to set aside the Clerk’s entry of default based on excusable delay, and in the conjunctive, to dismiss this case for want of subject matter jurisdiction. [ECF No. 28.] I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s claim identifies three named Defendants, ten Doe Defendants, and a San Diego County Superior Court Judge. [See Compl. ¶¶ 5–9.] Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and thus, the Court construes his filings liberally. Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d…