Simon

Simon v. Bostic

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20243:24-cv-01665California1,426 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILLIP W. SIMON, Case No.: 24-CV-01665-CAB-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

v. [ECF Nos. 1, 19, 24–26, 28.] TANISHA BOSTIC et al., Defendants. 16 On September 18, 2024, Plaintiff Phillip W. Simon filed a complaint against Defendants Tanisha Bostic, Lynetta Watts, Nora Watts, Sharon L. “Kalemkarian,” and Does 1–10. [ECF No. 1.] Plaintiff has moved for default judgment against three of the named Defendants. [ECF No. 19, 24–26.] Those Defendants have asked this Court to set aside the Clerk’s entry of default based on excusable delay, and in the conjunctive, to dismiss this case for want of subject matter jurisdiction. [ECF No. 28.] I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s claim identifies three named Defendants, ten Doe Defendants, and a San Diego County Superior Court Judge. [See Compl. ¶¶ 5–9.] Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and thus, the Court construes his filings liberally. Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.