Sifuentes

Sifuentes v. X Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20243:24-cv-00590California5,668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES,

Case No. 24-cv-00590-SK Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND

X CORP., INC., DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE

10 Defendant. Regarding Docket No. 37

Plaintiff David Angel Sifuentes, III (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings claims under state law arising from three alleged data breaches that compromised Plaintiff’s account information stored with Defendant X Corp., Inc., formerly Twitter, Inc (“Defendant”). (Dkt. No. 32.) This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 37.) This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Both parties consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (Dkt. Nos. 9, 28.) Having carefully considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in the case, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s motion for the reasons set forth below. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.