Rao
Rao v. LaRose
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VINOD RAO, Case No.: 24cv1716 RSH (MSB)
Petitioner,
ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED
v. PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, Warden, et al., 15 Respondents.
17 On September 23, 2024—Petitioner, who was at that time a detainee in the custody of the Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, proceeding pro se—filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging a San Diego Superior Court judgment of conviction and resulting sentence to two years of probation. ECF No. 1. On October 2, 2024, the Court dismissed the case without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement, because Petitioner was not in actual custody pursuant to a state court judgment at the time of his filing, and for failure to name a proper respondent. ECF No. 4. The Court noted that given Petitioner was in the custody of federal immigration…