Nakashyan

(PC) Tate v. Nakashyan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20241:22-cv-00624California3,058 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEREK TATE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00624-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

v. (Doc. 42) DIANA NAKASHYAN, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

Defendants. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBMIT

SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT

OF MOTION

(Doc. 56)

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE

19 (Doc. 59)

Plaintiff Derek Tate is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Nakashyan,1 Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim against Defendant Custer, and Fifth Amendment equal protection claim against Defendant Nakashyan. 26 27 1 Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendant Custer was dismissed for a failure to exhaust administrative remedies on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.