Nakashyan
(PC) Tate v. Nakashyan
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20241:22-cv-00624California3,058 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEREK TATE, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00624-SKO (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
v. (Doc. 42) DIANA NAKASHYAN, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
Defendants. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBMIT
SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION
(Doc. 56)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE
19 (Doc. 59)
Plaintiff Derek Tate is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendant Nakashyan,1 Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claim against Defendant Custer, and Fifth Amendment equal protection claim against Defendant Nakashyan. 26 27 1 Plaintiff’s retaliation claim against Defendant Custer was dismissed for a failure to exhaust administrative remedies on…