Pheiffer

(PC) Singh v. Pheiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20241:22-cv-01412California622 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 MICHAEL MANJEET SINGH, Case No. 1:22-cv-01412-KES-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS

FROM PARTIES REGARDING

v. SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE PHEIFFER, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint and has ordered the case to proceed. (ECF No. 28, 35).1 Further, this case did not settle following an early settlement conference between the parties. (ECF No. 53). Before scheduling this case, the Court will require each party to submit a statement regarding the schedule and discovery matters. The statements regarding the schedule and discovery shall be filed within thirty days from the date of service of this order. They should be filed with the Court, titled “SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY STATEMENT,” and include the name of the party filing the statement. They shall address all of the following issues: i. A brief summary of the parties’ claims and/or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.