Greenspan

Greenspan v. Musk

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20243:24-cv-04647California759 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AARON JACOB GREENSPAN, Case No. 24-cv-04647-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY

v. DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON

MOTIONS TO DISMISS; DENYING AS

ELON MUSK, et al., MOOT MOTION TO COMPEL

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND

Defendants. MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE

RELIEF REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL Re: Doc. Nos. 101, 124, 126

14 Before the Court is the "Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Ruling on Motions to Dismiss" (ECF No. 101 ("Motion to Stay")), filed October 26, 2024, by Elon Musk, Tesla, Inc., the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003, X Corp., Excession, LLC, Jared Birchall, Morgan Stanley & Company, LLC, Singer Cashman LLP, Allison Huebert, Adam S. Cashman, Adam G. Mehes, and Alex Spiro (collectively, "Moving Defendants"). On November 12, 2024, plaintiff Aaron Jacob Greenspan ("Greenspan") filed opposition, to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.