(PC) Arrellano-Lopez v. Gonzales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20241:23-cv-00093California600 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 JORGE N. ARRELLANO-LOPEZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-00093-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING STATEMENTS

FROM PARTIES REGARDING

SCHEDULE AND DISCOVERY v. THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

J. GONZALES, et al.,

14 Defendant(s).

16 The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint and has ordered the case to proceed. On 17 November 26, 2024, Defendants filed a notice stating that a settlement conference would not be 18 productive at this time. (ECF No. 28). Accordingly, the Court will proceed with scheduling the 19 case. However, before scheduling this case, the Court will require each party to submit a 20 statement regarding the schedule and discovery matters. 21 The statements regarding the schedule and discovery shall be filed within thirty days from 22 the date of service of this order. They should be filed with the Court, titled “SCHEDULING 23 AND DISCOVERY STATEMENT,” and include the name of the party filing the statement. 24 They shall address all of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.