Damari William Singleton v. United States Penitentiary, Victorville

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20245:24-cv-00153California639 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAMARI WILLIAM SINGLETON, Case No. EDCV 24-0153 SB (PVC)

Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

v. CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

J. DOERER, Interim Warden, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner’s objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. The Court additionally addresses Petitioner’s argument that it has jurisdiction over his classification designation under Rodriguez v. Copenhaver, 823 F.3d 1238 (9th Cir. 2016). Dkt. No. 30 at 2–3; see Rodriguez, 823 F.3d at 1242 (“Although a district court has no jurisdiction over discretionary designation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.