Fullove

Fullove v. Fullove

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20243:24-cv-02616California1,656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIANNE FULLOVE, Case No. 24-cv-02616-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. BOND; MOTION FOR WRIT OF

ATTACHMENT

SHALUINN FULLOVE, Re: Dkt. Nos. 43, 69 Defendant.

12 Now before the Court is the motion for bond filed by Defendant Shaluinn Fullove, (Dkt. No. 43), and the motion for writ of attachment filed by Plaintiff Marianne Fullove, (Dkt. No. 69). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, exhibits, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7- 1(b). For the following reasons, the Court DENIES both motions. BACKGROUND As set forth in greater detail in the Court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, (Dkt. No. 99), this dispute centers on a falling out between Plaintiff and Defendant which ultimately resulted in Plaintiff’s alleged ouster from a shared …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.