Do

Do v. California Corrections Health Care Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20245:23-cv-05906California484 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MINH CONG DO, Case No. 23-cv-05906 BLF (PR)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

TO PROVIDE MORE

v. INFORMATION FOR DEFENDANT

HAKAKI

CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONS HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against medical staff at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”) where he was 20 formerly housed. Dkt. No. 8. On October 3, 2024, the Court found the amended 21 complaint stated cognizable claims against Defendants Dr. Bzoskie and Nurse Hakaki and 22 ordered the matter served. Dkt. No. 22. The CDCR filed a response, stating that they are 23 unable to identify “Nurse Hakaki.” Dkt. No. 23. Accordingly, this Defendant has not yet 24 been served. 25 Although a plaintiff who is incarcerated and proceeding in forma pauperis may rely 26 on service by the Marshal, such plaintiff “may not remain silent and do nothing to 27 effectuate such service”; rather,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.