Yangtze Memory Technologies, Inc. v. Strand Consult

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20245:24-cv-03454California1,136 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 YANGTZE MEMORY TECHNOLOGIES, Case No. 24-cv-03454-BLF INC., et al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY AND v. VACATING HEARING 10 STRAND CONSULT, et al., [Re: ECF No. 39] 11 Defendants. 12 Defendants Strand Consult and Roslyn Layton’s (collectively, “Defendants”) filed the Motion to Stay Discovery until resolution of Defendants’ upcoming Motion to Strike and Motion to Dismiss. ECF 39. Plaintiffs Yangtze Memory Technologies Company, Ltd., and Yangtze Memory Technologies, Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. ECF 46. The Court finds this motion appropriate for disposition without oral argument. See Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). After considering the moving and responding papers and the relevant record, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery and VACATES the hearing set for March 13, 2025. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs allege…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.