Banuelos

Banuelos v. Dominos Pizza LLC, a Michigan limited liability company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 2, 20245:24-cv-07085California1,172 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 BENJAMIN BANUELOS, Case No. 5:24-cv-07085-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

v. TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

DOMINOS PIZZA LLC, A MICHIGAN

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY,

11 Defendant. [Re: ECF No. 27]

13 Defendant Domino’s Pizza LLC has moved for an order extending their deadline to respond to Plaintiff Benjamin Banuelos’s Complaint until 21 days from the date on which their motion was filed. ECF No. 27 (“Mot.”). Plaintiff did not file a response to the motion. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(B) states that “[w]hen an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time . . . on motion made after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect.” “This rule, like all the Federal Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.