Hughes

Hughes v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2024B331083California5,469 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stone, J.

Filed 11/8/24; modified and certified for publication 12/3/24 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

ERIN HUGHES, B331083

(Los Angeles County Super. Plaintiff and Appellant, Ct. No. 21TRCV00431)

v.

FARMERS INSURANCE

EXCHANGE,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ronald F. Frank, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Aleksandr Gruzman and Aleksandr Gruzman for Plaintiff and Appellant. Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, Peter Schwartz, Christopher R. Wagner, and Jennifer Y. Ro for Defendant and Respondent.

___________________ Plaintiff and appellant Erin Hughes obtained two homeowner’s insurance policies to cover her real property. One of the policies, through the California FAIR Plan Association (FAIR Plan), covered loss due to fire. The other policy, issued by defendant and respondent Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers), did not. After a fire on the property caused significant loss, Hughes filed a lawsuit alleging Farmers was vicariously liable for the negligence of its agent that resulted in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.