Shoker

Shoker v. Ghuman CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 3, 2024A167539California1,124 words

Opinion

Opinion

Burns, J.

Filed 12/3/24 Shoker v. Ghuman CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for pur- poses of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

DEVINDER S. SHOKER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, A167539 v. SUKHJINDER SINGH GHUMAN et (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. al., RG19036992) Defendants and Respondents.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

In this fraud action, defendants Sukhjinder Singh Ghuman and Jasbir S. Phangureh filed a motion for a discovery protective order, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2025.420,2 based on assertions that plaintiffs Devinder S. Shoker and

We resolve this appeal by a memorandum opinion

pursuant to California Standards of Judicial Administration, standard 8.1, and the First Appellate District Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.