LeGrand
LeGrand v. Abbott Laboratories
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CONDALISA LEGRAND, et al., Case No. 22-cv-05815-TSH
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED
COMPLAINT
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, Re: Dkt. No. 92 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Condalisa LeGrand’s motion to amend pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 15(a) and 16. ECF No. 92. Defendant Abbott Laboratories (“Abbott”) filed an Opposition (ECF No. 104) and Plaintiff filed a Reply (ECF No. 105). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the motion.12 II. BACKGROUND Abbott manufactures, markets, and distributes several different “nutrition” shakes and drinks under its Ensure brand. Proposed Second Am. Compl. (“SAC”) ¶ 1, ECF No. 92-2. Among those Ensure products (the “challenged products”) are seven at issue in this case: Ensure Original Nutrition Shake, Ensure Complete Nutrition Shake, Ensure Compact…