Treez, Inc. v. United States Department of Homeland Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TREEZ, INC., et al., Case No. 22-cv-07027-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants.
15 By separate order, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment has been granted and defendants’ cross motion has been denied. This order addresses (1) the magistrate judge’s order directing defendants to show cause before the undersigned why they should not be held in contempt, and (2) plaintiffs’ challenge to the magistrate judge’s conclusion that monetary sanctions against defendants are not available. 21 Order to show cause re contempt The magistrate judge issued extensive factual findings that the government repeatedly and without adequate justification failed to comply with orders requiring the government to search for documents to produce as part of the Administrative Record. See Dkt. No. 94. (“The undersigned …