Shahbazian

(PC) Baker v. Shahbazian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20241:24-cv-01279California880 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MILLARD WAYNE BAKER, Case No. 1:24-cv-01279-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER NOTING VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND

v. DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO RULE 41 AND RULE 15(a) DR. SHAHBAZIAN, et al., (Doc. No. 11) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Millard Wayne Baker, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his Complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1). On November 15, 2024, the Court issued a screening order on Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Doc. No. 9). As discussed at length in the Court’s November 15, 2024 Screening Order, the Complaint states a cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate medical indifference claim against Defendant Dr. Shahbazian and state law claims against Shahbazian for negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress, but no other claims. (Id. at 1). The Screening Order afforded Plaintiff the opportunity to (1) file an amended complaint; (2) file a notice under Rule 41 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.