Daram

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STEVEN DEL TORO, No. 2:22-cv-0725 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VASUKI DARAM, et al., Defendants. 15 By order filed October 21, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within twenty-one days, why defendant Schultz should not be dismissed for failure to effect timely service. ECF No. 56. The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. For the reasons set forth in the October 21, 2024 order to show cause (ECF No. 56), which is incorporated herein by reference, the court finds that plaintiff has failed to timely serve defendant. Plaintiff has further failed to show good cause why defendant Schultz should not be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) (when a defendant has not been served within ninety days after the complaint is filed the court must dismiss the action against that defendant unless plaintiff can show good cause for…