Yang
Yang v. County of Yuba
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHUE DOA YANG, et al.,
Plaintiffs, No. 2:23-cv-00066-TLN-JDP v. COUNTY OF YUBA, et al., ORDER Defendants.
15 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of Yuba (the “County”), Jeffrey T. Palmer (“Palmer”), and Ismael Ramos’s (“Ramos”) (collectively, “County Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 53.) Plaintiffs Chue Doa Yang and Mai Thao Yang (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 54.) County Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 56.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part County Defendants’ motion. /// /// /// ///
Defendants Wellpath, LLC, Christina Boets (“Boets”), and Taylor Fithian (“Fithian”) (collectively, “Wellpath Defendants”) filed an answer to Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (see ECF No. 52), and thus are not party to the instant motion to dismiss. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The facts of this case are set forth in full in…