Youssef

(PC) Hill v. Youssef

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 3, 20242:23-cv-00492California3,452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TION ALONZO GRIMMETT HILL, Sr., Case No. 2:23-cv-0492-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A. YOUSSEF, et al.,

Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brought this action under section 1983 alleging that defendants Nguyen, Youssef, Branch, and Miranda violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to provide adequate medical care for his injured left eye. Now, all defendants have moved for summary judgment. Defendant Nguyen has filed her own motion, ECF No. 30, and the other defendants have submitted a second, separate motion, ECF No. 51. Both should be granted. Legal Standards Summary judgment is appropriate where there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); Washington Mutual Inc. v. United States, 636 F.3d 1207, 1216 (9th Cir. 2011). An issue of fact is genuine only if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.