Hasmik Chinaryan v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
122 F.4th 823
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202421-56237California1,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HASMIK JASMINE CHINARYAN, Nos. 21-56237 Individually and as Guardian as Litem 22-55168 for NEC, a Minor; MARIANA MANUKYAN, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-09302- Plaintiffs-Appellants, MCS-E v.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS ORDER

ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT;

MICHEL MOORE, Chief of Police; ROMERO GONZALEZ, Officer; FRED CUETO, Sergeant; RODRIGO SORIA, Officer; AIRAM POTTER, Officer; BRITTANY OKE, Officer; JEFF RODD, Officer; DANIEL MARTINEZ, Officer; DANIEL GAYTON, Officer; EDUARDO PICHE, Officer; MARIO MENSES, Officer; BRITTANY PRIMO, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees.

Filed December 4, 2024

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Jacqueline H. Nguyen, and Danielle J. Forrest, Circuit Judges. SUMMARY *

Recalling the Mandate

The panel denied defendants’ motion to recall this court’s mandate and to stay proceedings while they seek certiorari in the Supreme Court. Following the issuance of the mandate in this case, the parties stipulated to stay the proceedings in the district court while defendants sought certiorari in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.