United States v. Dominic Dorsey

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202419-50182California578 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-50182

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00328-CAS-1 v.

DOMINIC DORSEY, AKA Boo, AKA MEMORANDUM* Boogaloo, AKA Dominic Cavanaughn Dorsey,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 15, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: COLLINS, H.A. THOMAS, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Dominic Dorsey was convicted after a jury trial of Hobbs Act robbery and

conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a), and

of brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 924(c)(1)(A)(ii), (c)(1)(C)(i). Dorsey appealed, arguing that the district court

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. erred by (1) not asking the jurors whether they had seen an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.