Rojas Hernandez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202423-3473California453 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIAN ROJAS HERNANDEZ; YEIMI No. 23-3473 BELEN PATINO Agency Nos.

LOPEZ; U.A.P.; O.P.L.; A.P.L., A201-071-463

A216-627-563

Petitioners,

A216-627-564

A216-627-565

v. A216-627-566 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Julian Rojas Hernandez, his wife Yeimi Belen Patino Lopez, and Patino

Lopez’s children U.A.P., O.P.L., and A.P.L. (collectively “Petitioners”) are natives

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and citizens of Mexico. They…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.