Rojas Hernandez v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202423-3473California453 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 4 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULIAN ROJAS HERNANDEZ; YEIMI No. 23-3473 BELEN PATINO Agency Nos.
LOPEZ; U.A.P.; O.P.L.; A.P.L., A201-071-463
A216-627-563
Petitioners,
A216-627-564
A216-627-565
v. A216-627-566 MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 2, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.
Julian Rojas Hernandez, his wife Yeimi Belen Patino Lopez, and Patino
Lopez’s children U.A.P., O.P.L., and A.P.L. (collectively “Petitioners”) are natives
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and citizens of Mexico. They…