Padilla Herrera v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202423-2475California794 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAYDA VANESSA PADILLA No. 23-2475 HERRERA, Agency No.

A209-418-112

Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER, BERZON, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Sayda Padilla Herrera (Petitioner), a native and citizen of Honduras, seeks

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision dismissing her appeal

from an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under

8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.