Cruz Carmona v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202423-2461California645 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUANA CRUZ CARMONA; NANCY No. 23-2461 ARELI LOPEZ CRUZ; CARLOS Agency Nos.

EDUARDO LOPEZ CRUZ, A098-762-926

A208-308-975

Petitioners,

A208-308-976

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 4, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, PAEZ, and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges.

Juana Cruz Carmona (“Cruz”), her daughter Nancy Areli Lopez Cruz

(“Nancy”), and her son Carlos Eduardo Lopez Cruz (“Carlos”) (“Petitioners”),

natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of a decision of the Board of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”)

denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.