Andreas

Andreas v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 202423-2196California2,051 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 4 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GIDEON ANDREAS, No. 23-2196 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-751-161 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 7, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, WALLACH***, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges. Partial Dissent by Judge DE ALBA.

Petitioner Gideon Andreas, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that dismissed his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Evan J. Wallach, United States Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. appeal from an order of an immigration judge (“IJ”) that denied his applications…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.