County of Los Angeles v. Herman CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 2024B333177California3,467 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/4/24 County of Los Angeles v. Herman CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, B333177

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 23STRO04616)

ARMANDO HERMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gary Eto, Judge. Affirmed. Armando Herman, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Dawyn R. Harrison, County Counsel, Kent M. Sommer, Deputy County Counsel; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Edward L. Xanders and Tina Kuang, for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________________________________ Appellant Armando Herman is the subject of restraining orders…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.