County of Los Angeles v. Herman CA2/2
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 12/4/24 County of Los Angeles v. Herman CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, B333177
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 23STRO04616)
ARMANDO HERMAN,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Gary Eto, Judge. Affirmed. Armando Herman, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. Dawyn R. Harrison, County Counsel, Kent M. Sommer, Deputy County Counsel; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Edward L. Xanders and Tina Kuang, for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________________________________ Appellant Armando Herman is the subject of restraining orders…