Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN BIGOSKI ODOM, Case No. 1:20-cv-01120-KES-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

J. TAYLOR, et al., (Doc. 42)

Defendants. 14-Day Deadline

16 Plaintiff Ryan Bigoski Odom is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Taylor, Khoo, Attinello, Ezenwugo, Mitchell and Singh. I. INTRODUCTION On August 28, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment concerning the merits of Plaintiff’s claims. (Doc. 42.) The motion included a Rand1 warning (Doc. 42-3), addressing the requirements concerning an opposition to a motion for summary judgment. On October 3, 2024, the Court issued its Order to Show Cause (OSC) Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed for…