Barnes

Barnes v. Barnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20243:24-cv-00718California513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARENE BARNES, Case No.: 24cv718-LL-MMP

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

vs. BIANCA R. BARNES, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Darene Barnes, pro se, filed a short Complaint along with a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (“IFP”), and a Request for Appointment of Counsel. ECF Nos. 1-3. The Court declines to rule on the IFP Motion and the Request for Appointment of Counsel at this time because it is clear the Complaint must be dismissed. The Complaint states that the relief requested is “I will like my house back.” ECF No. 1 at 1. In support thereof, the Complaint includes one paragraph, but it is mostly illegible and made up of fragmented sentences such as “Lynnell Barnes had a stak on him. Die. Pop Store Pop work away Seattle Police Pop Lynnell Down and Be in Seattle Police. Eye open to hour diff. Derick C. Barnes problem child. Bianca Pop house Down. . . .” Id. at 3. The Complaint does not include the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.