Heitkoetter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARKUS HEITKOETTER, et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-0368-KES-BAM Plaintiffs, ORDER REGARDING JOINT

DISCOVERY DISPUTE STATEMENT

v. (Doc. 119) KARL DOMM,

Defendant. 16

Currently before the Court is the parties’ Joint Status Report on Disputed Discovery (Doc. 119), which clarifies the remaining discovery disputes between the parties. Having considered the briefing, and the entire docket, and for the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that Plaintiffs must supplement their responses to Interrogatory Nos. 8, 12, and 20 to Plaintiff Heitkoetter; Request for Production No. 10 to Plaintiff Heitkoetter, and Request for Production No. 38 to Plaintiff Rockwell. I. Brief Factual and Procedural Background In the interest of brevity, the Court highlights pertinent parts of the case background. Plaintiffs Markus Heitkoetter and Rockwell Trading Services, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) bring several claims sounding in defamation against Defendant Karl…