Tapia

(PC) Solomon v. Tapia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20241:22-cv-01604California1,592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KING SOLOMON, Case No. 1:22-cv-1604-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

v. (Doc. No. 37) TAPIA,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendant. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

(Doc. No. 39) 17 Pending before the Court are two motions filed by Plaintiff King Solomon. The first is a Motion to Compel Discovery filed on October 31, 2024. (Doc. No. 37). Defendants timely filed an Opposition on November 19, 2024. (Doc. No. 38). Also pending is Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time filed November 21, 2024. (Doc. No. 39). Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his First Amended Complaint against Defendant Tapia. (Doc. Nos. 19, 20). For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants in part Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel but denies his Motion for Extension of Time. MOTION TO COMPEL In his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.