(PC)Coleman

(PC)Coleman v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20241:23-cv-00324California1,539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAAHDI ABDUL COLEMAN, Case No.: 1:23-cv-00324-CDB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS THIS ACTION FOR

v. PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO OBEY

COURT ORDERS AND FAILURE TO

MOORE, et al., PROSECUTE

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE

Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge

17 Plaintiff Saahdi Abdul Coleman is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. INTRODUCTION On November 6, 2024, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 7.) It determined Plaintiff had plausibly alleged Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claims against Defendants Bean, Crawford, Doe 1, Doe 2, McDaniel, Moore, Russell, and Vasquez, but failed to allege any other cognizable claim against any other named Defendant. (Id. at 10-16.) Plaintiff was ordered to do one of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.