Clandenin

(PC) Felix v. Clandenin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20241:23-cv-00839California1,612 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT EMERSON FELIX, Case No. 1:23-cv-00839-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING RENEWED MOTION

FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 28) CLANDENIN, et al.,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART THIRD

Defendants. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

(ECF No. 29)

SIXTY (60) DAY DEADLINE

18 I. Procedural Background Plaintiff Scott Emerson Felix (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). On June 14, 2024, the Court issued a screening order granting Plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal within thirty (30) days. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.