Roffman
Roffman v. REBBL, INC.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MEHVA ROFFMAN, Case No. 22-cv-05290-JSW
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
REBBL, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 62 Defendant.
12 Now before the Court for consideration is the motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Rebbl, Inc. (“Rebbl”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case and HEREBY GRANTS Rebbl’s motion. BACKGROUND The facts underlying this dispute are set forth in the Court’s Order granting, in part, and denying, in part, Rebbl’s motion to dismiss the original complaint filed by Plaintiff Mehva Roffman (“Roffman”). See Roffman v. Rebbl, Inc., 653 F. Supp. 3d 723, 726-27 (N.D. Cal. 2023). The Court will not repeat them here except as necessary to the analysis. In brief, Roffman alleges the manner in which Rebbl advertises the amount of protein in its beverages is both unlawful and misleading.…