F.G.

F.G. v. CooperSurgical, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20244:24-cv-01261California6,159 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 F.G., et al., Case No. 24-cv-01261-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS AND STRIKE

COOPERSURGICAL, INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 68, 69 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is CooperSurgical Inc.’s (“CooperSurgical”) motion to dismiss and CooperSurgical and The Cooper Companies, Inc.’s (“CooperCompanies”) (together, “Defendants”) motion to strike. ECF Nos. 68, 69. The Court will deny the motion to strike and the motion to dismiss as directed to Plaintiffs T.U and V.W. I. BACKGROUND1 A. Defendants CooperSurgical and CooperCompanies CooperSurgical and CooperCompanies “manufacture, market, and sell products to fertility clinics, including a culture media product designed to support the growth and development of embryos created through” in vitro fertilization (“IVF”). FAC ¶ 2. Embryo culture media is “a nutrient-rich liquid that surrounds a fertilized egg during the incubation period to help it develop 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.