Ugalde
Ugalde v. ASInc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4 ANTONIA VERDE UGALDE, Case No. 24-cv-08684-NC 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE v. REMANDED TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT ASINC., et al., MATTER JURISDICTION 8 Defendants. Re: ECF 1 9 10 This Court orders Defendants to show cause why this case should not be remanded back to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). District courts have subject matter jurisdiction through federal question or diversity jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1332. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity of citizenship and an amount in controversy greater than $75,000. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Defendants claim that there is diversity of citizenship because Plaintiff resides in California, Defendant Advance…