CDCR

(PC) Millare v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20242:22-cv-01862California1,323 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MORIANO MILLARE, No. 2:22-cv-1862 DC CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former prisoner, is proceeding without counsel with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel and to extend the discovery deadline. (ECF No. 39.) Also pending is defendants’ motion to extend the discovery deadline. (ECF No. 41.) For the following reasons, plaintiff’s motion to compel is denied and the motions to extend the discovery deadline are granted. I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL A. Plaintiff’s Argument in Support of Motion to Compel Plaintiff alleges that on September 8, 2024, plaintiff served defendants with one request for production of documents, three sets of interrogatories and three sets of requests for admissions. (ECF No. 39 at 1-2.) On September 17, 2024, plaintiff transferred from the Correctional Training…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.