Prado

(PC) Reed v. Prado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20242:23-cv-01101California1,470 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZAYA REED, No. 2:23-cv-1101 KJM CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER OFFICER PRADO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment filed on June 14, 2024. I. PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT This action proceeds on plaintiff’s allegations that on December 21, 2022, while plaintiff was held in the Solano County Justice Center, Officers Prado, Bubar, Martinez, Flores, Whitney, and Sgt. Taylor, used excessive force on plaintiff. (ECF No. 8 at 2.) /// 26 Plaintiff consented to the dismissal of defendants Solano County Justice Center, Well Path Medical, Lt. A. Hagen and Officer Ruiz, who were dismissed without prejudice on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.