Dominisse

(PC) James v. Dominisse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20242:24-cv-00448California2,604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD EUGENE JAMES, No. 2:24-cv-0448 DJC SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER PAMELA JEAN DOMINISSE, Defendant. 16 Ronald Eugene James, a Sacramento County jail detainee, proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff initiated this action with a complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Prior to the court’s screening of the complaint as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff has also filed several other pending motions. The court construes the filing of the first amended complaint as a motion to amend. So construed, the court grants the motion and treats the first amended complaint as the operative complaint. The first amended complaint fails to state a claim, but plaintiff is granted leave to file a further amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.