Aniche

Aniche v. Jaddou

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 4, 20242:24-cv-01532California2,150 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OBIOMA ANICHE, No. 2:24-cv-01532-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER UR MENDOZA JADDOU, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Obioma Aniche filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief against United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”), and individual defendants, arising from the denial of plaintiff’s I-360 petition. (ECF No. 1.) Pursuant to the parties’ consent and the court’s order of September 20, 2024, this matter was before the undersigned for all purposes including trial and entry of judgment. (ECF Nos. 12, 13, 14.) The defendants seek to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of jurisdiction and their motion is fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 8, 11, 18.) The court previously found this matter to be appropriate for decision without oral argument under Local Rule 302(g). (ECF No. 19.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is granted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.