Weiser Law Firm Pc v. Michael Hartleib
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202423-55693California3,239 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WEISER LAW FIRM PC; ROBERT B. Nos. 23-55693
WEISER, 23-55729
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 8:23-cv-00171-CJC-JDE
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MICHAEL HARTLEIB,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 5, 2024 Pasadena, California
Before: COLLINS and LEE, Circuit Judges, and RODRIGUEZ,** District Judge.
Plaintiffs Weiser Law Firm PC and Robert Weiser, its principal and founder,
(collectively, “Weiser”) appeal the district court’s order granting Defendant
Michael Hartleib’s special motion to strike under California’s anti-Strategic
Lawsuit Against Public Participation (“anti-SLAPP”) statute, see CAL. CODE CIV.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Xavier Rodriguez, United States District Judge for the…