Valdovinos Enriquez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202423-1272California703 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IRMA VALDOVINOS No. 23-1272 ENRIQUEZ; FERNANDO DANIEL Agency Nos.

RAMIREZ VALDOVINOS, A202-097-592

A202-097-593

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: SANCHEZ and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and ZIPPS, Chief District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps, United States Chief District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Irma Valdovinos Enriquez and her minor son Fernando Daniel Ramirez

Valdovinos (collectively “Valdovinos…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.