United States v. Juan Gamez-Salas

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202421-50278California918 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

DEC 5 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-50278

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:21-cr-00995-LAB-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JUAN CARLOS GAMEZ-SALAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 3, 2024** Pasadena, California Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Juan Carlos Gamez-Salas appeals the sentence imposed after he was

convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He also challenges the constitutionality of

U.S.C. § 1326, arguing that it violates the equal protection guarantee under the Fifth

Amendment. “We review the district court’s interpretation of the Sentencing

Guidelines de novo,” its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.