Peralta Valdez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202423-1714California1,011 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMBROCIO PERALTA No. 23-1714 VALDEZ; ZIDEISY GONZALEZ Agency Nos.

LEYVA; SAMUEL PERALTA A208-920-619

GONZALEZ, A208-920-561

A208-920-562

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Ambrocio Peralta Valdez, Zideisy Gonzalez Leyva, and Samuel

Peralta Gonzalez—natives and citizens of Mexico—petition for review of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissal of their appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.