Kyland Young v. Neocortext, Inc.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KYLAND YOUNG, individually and on No. 23-55772 behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee, 2:23-cv-02496-WLH-PVC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NEOCORTEXT, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Wesley L. Hsu, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 6, 2024 Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW, HURWITZ, and DESAI, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge DESAI. Defendant-Appellant NeoCortext, Inc., (“NeoCortext”) appeals the district

court’s denial of its motion to strike pursuant to California Civil Procedure Code

§ 425.16, commonly known as California’s anti-SLAPP statute. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

In this putative class action, Plaintiff-Appellee Kyland Young (“Young”)

alleges that NeoCortext violated…