Avila-Rosas

Avila-Rosas v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202423-2191California1,061 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

DEC 5 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BERNARDA YESSENIA AVILA- No. 23-2191 ROSAS; J.E. FERRER AVILA; M.T. Agency Nos.

FERRER AVILA, A206-263-363

A208-919-844

Petitioners,

A208-919-843

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: SANCHEZ and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and ZIPPS, Chief District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps, United States Chief District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. Bernarda Yessenia Avila-Rosas and her two minor children, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) ruling…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.