Simonian

Simonian v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202423-4117California834 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD SIMONIAN; DAVID No. 23-4117 SIMONIAN; ALEX SIMONIAN, Agency Nos.

A205-777-317

Petitioners, A205-777-319

A205-777-320

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: BYBEE, IKUTA, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Edward Simonian and his two children (collectively “Simonian”) petition for

review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing their

appeal of an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.