Gallardo Maldonado v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 202423-4048California747 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS LEONARDO GALLARDO No. 23-4048 MALDONADO, et al., Agency Nos. Petitioners, A240-850-268

A240-850-269

v. A240-850-270

A240-850-271

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 3, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: BOGGS***, McKEOWN, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Leonardo Gallardo Maldonado, together with his wife Cindi Nissley

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Court of Appeals, 6th Circuit, sitting by designation. Rojas Ramirez and two minor children (“Gallardo”), are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.